Damir Keretic vs Paul Annacone Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
D. Keretic vs P. Annacone

Damir Keretic

GER

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Right-Handed

Paul Annacone

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-To-Head: Keretic 1 - 0 Annacone

They have played 3 sets in total, with Damir Keretic winning 2 and Paul Annacone winning 1. The last match between Damir Keretic and Paul Annacone was at the Sydney Outdoor, 10-12-1984, Round: R2, Surface: Grass, with Damir Keretic getting the victory 1-6 6-2 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Keretic	1
Annacone	0

Last H2H Matches:

(R2) Sydney Outdoor(12-10-84)

Stats

Damir Keretic

Paul Annacone

D. Keretic vs P. Annacone H2H Profile

D. Keretic	Stats	P. Annacone
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
47.02% (134-151)	Career Total W/L	55.29% (162-131)
1	Grass	0
1	Titles	3
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

D. Keretic vs P. Annacone Match Preview

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Damir Keretic has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Paul Annacone has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Damir Keretic, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Paul Annacone has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Damir Keretic has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paul Annacone has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Damir Keretic has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Paul Annacone winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Damir Keretic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 110/ 108), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 31% (W/L 11/ 24). Paul Annacone has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 62% (W/L 39/ 24), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
Player level: In the last year, Damir Keretic has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0), where as Paul Annacone has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Damir Keretic winning 1 times and Paul Annacone being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Damir Keretic winning 2 and Paul Annacone winning 1. The last match between Damir Keretic and Paul Annacone was at the Sydney Outdoor, 10-12-1984, Round: R2, Surface: Grass, with Damir Keretic getting the victory 1-6 6-2 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Damir Keretic has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Paul Annacone has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Damir Keretic has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paul Annacone has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Damir Keretic has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paul Annacone has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Damir Keretic vs Paul Annacone Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

D. Keretic vs P. Annacone H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

D. Keretic	Stats	P. Annacone
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
13	Games Won	9
0:0:0	Avg. Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won → Match Won	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won → Match Lost	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost → Match Won	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

D. Keretic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Neu Ulm CH - 03-07-1989
R4 Christian WeisC. Weis	L	2-6 6-2 7-6	Stats
R3 Gerald MarzenellG. Marzenell	W	6-3 6-1	Stats
Salzburg CH - 15-05-1989
R3 Marcelo IngaramoM. Ingaramo	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
Forest Hills - 01-05-1989
R2 Patrick BaurP. Baur	W	6-3 6-2	Stats
R3 Andres GomezA. Gomez	L	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

P. Annacone Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Beijing - 18-10-1993
R1 Shuzo MatsuokaS. Matsuoka	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
Long Island - 24-08-1992
R1 Carsten ArriensC. Arriens	L	6-2 2-6 6-2	Stats
Manchester - 15-06-1992
R2 Arne ThomsA. Thoms	L	1-6 7-5 6-3	Stats
R1 Andrei CherkasovA. Cherkasov	W	7-6(4) 6-7(2) 7-6(7)	Stats
Philadelphia - 17-02-1992
R1 Jeff TarangoJ. Tarango	L	6-7(4) 6-1 6-3	Stats

View All

D. Keretic vs P. Annacone Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

D. Keretic	Stats	P. Annacone
47.02% (134/151)	YTD Win/Loss	55.29% (162/131)
47.07% (345/388)	Sets Win/Loss	53.34% (415/363)
49.29% (3394/3492)	Games Win/Loss	51.17% (3968/3787)
31.43% (11/24)	Hard Win/Loss	49.19% (61/63)
50.46% (110/108)	Clay Win/Loss	46.67% (7/8)
42.86% (6/8)	Indoor Hard W/L	60.44% (55/36)
38.89% (7/11)	Grass Win/Loss	61.90% (39/24)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
467.75	Average Opponent Rank	254.37
50.00% (15/15)	Slam W/L	54.17% (26/22)
44.44% (4/5)	Masters W/L	36.84% (7/12)
66.67% (4/2)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
41.38% (72/102)	Main Tour W/L	56.95% (127/96)
59.09% (39/27)	Challenger W/L	66.67% (2/1)
46% (115/249)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	55% (126/230)
54% (19/35)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	54% (32/59)
0% (0/0)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	71% (5/7)
52% (55/105)	Deciding Set Win %	51% (55/107)
76% (125/95)	1st Set Won, Won Match	81% (155/125)
24% (125/30)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	19% (155/30)
24% (160/38)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	25% (135/34)